Ook THOM HOGAN vraagt zich af wat voor sensor er in zit.Léon Obers schreef: Ik weet het niet, de pixelafmetingen in hoogte breedte zijn exact op de pixel hetzelfde als de chip in de Sony.
6048 x 4032 pixels
Maar misschien zit er wel een andere layer boven de pixels met anders gevormde microlensjes:
"What’s more, we’ve optimized the pixel characteristics to provide a higher S/N ratio and wider dynamic range by securing a greater amount of light received by each pixel, thereby reducing lost highlights and shadows, and ensuring smoother tone reproduction with minimized noise."
.....
So it seems clear to me that the D3x sensor isn't the A900 sensor. There are some obvious differences that can be gleaned from the specs and without access to technical data sheets. At the same time, there are too many coincidences for the D3x sensor not to be based on the Sony sensel (the light sensing area of the photosite). It also seems clear that the low-pass filter is handled differently in the Nikon version. So all those thinking that the A900 and D3x should be the "same" for raw files are probably going to be proven wrong. And for JPEG files, the EXPEED and BIONZ image processing ASICs are certainly going to produce different results.
